Select Page

Dealing with Death – the perspective of both doctor and patient

Laura Powell

Modern medicine focuses largely on treatment and cure, but care of the dying and bereaved remains an important duty of a doctor (1). However this may not be easy for doctors, especially those newly qualified. In a longitudinal study dealing with death and dying was the most commonly reported source of stress among junior house officers (2). If medical training is heavily weighted on curing and treating patients, are doctors prepared and resilient for when treatment is no longer relevant, in the case of a dying patient? While doctors may feel it a duty to do everything in their power to prolong life as long as possible, the agenda of the patient may differ, wanting a peaceful, dignified death and a chance to organise finances and see family for the last time. Patients are all unique and in circumstances where the patient is dying, there is little opportunity for a normative style where doctors screen patient’s words for whatever corresponds to their own conceptual framework, blocking out what does not (3). In these circumstances, patients are likely to want more of a narrative style to convey what’s important to them at this time and for the doctor to hear their story behind the story: Hearing stories is the best way to understand what parts of the system are active including those all important hidden parts (4). For example, the doctor might not want to tell the patient how long they have left to live because they believe this may be detrimental to the patient’s health and take away their hope. However, the patient’s main concern might be to live long enough for a grandchild to be born or to arrange their finances and would prefer to know this information. Hinton (1967) advised physicians to listen to the patient’s wishes and questions and use them as a guide to how much information they should be told: If the patient’s questions are sincere, then why not give quite straight answers to the patient’s questions about his illness and outcome? It makes for beneficial trust (5). The Importance of society, spirituality/religion in their last moments also needs to be considered. These needs could be overlooked if the doctor doesn’t find out the story behind the story, for example, the reason a patient is refusing blood transfusions is because they are a Jehovah’s Witness and this is against their beliefs.

Some very interesting points are brought up in the play Cancer Tales by Nell Dunn (4). The mother of a patient with terminal cancer really appreciated the honesty of the doctor when he informed her that her was daughter was dying. The use of the word dying was important, removing the possibility of any false hope and helping both mother and daughter come to terms with the situation. I was surprised when the mother described how comforting it was to have a nurse sit with her during her daughter’s last hours. In this situation, I expected the mother to not want to be disturbed but instead she said it was wonderful to have her there, she knew about death and we didn’t. This raises the issue of doctors who don’t have this experience with death, trying to support dying patients and their families.

In a study on how doctors cope with death (1), registrars reported various reactions to the death of a patient such as feelings of shock, self-doubt and personalisation of the tragedy. Strategies for dealing with an emotional response after death included externalisation of the problem, using humour, psychological debriefing, training in breaking bad news and end of life management and support from consultants. Good group dynamics are important, leading to a strong support network. Doctors need to be able execute resilience in order to provide professional support to the family.

It can be difficult for doctors to come to terms with medical intervention failing them and having to accept that there is nothing else they can do. This is one of the themes I tackled in my artwork.

I aimed to accentuate the importance of the arts and creativity in medicine in my creative piece. I want this piece to potentially help doctors come to terms with giving bad news and represent the transition from trying to save the patient, to making them as comfortable as possible as they approach the end of their life (thus showing the power of art in aiding understanding). I have chosen to draw a heart because from a medical point of view, death is the cessation of all vital functions of the body, including heartbeat. I have used the pulmonary and systemic parts of the heart to divide it into the doctor and patient perspectives. The doctor’s side of the heart (left side) is more medicalised with red blood cells trickling through the valve to resemble an hour glass with sands of time, counting down the time the patient has left to live. There are tablets to represent the doctor’s intervention, trying to keep the patient alive. The hand supporting the heart is also to represent the doctor wanting to keep their patient alive as long as possible as they feel this is their role, not wanting to give up on the patient. There is a sense of dehumanisation of the patient, with only medical aspects incorporated.

Meanwhile, in contrast on the patient’s side (right side of heart), I have represented children and finances which are important to the patient before they die. The patient’s hand has let go of the heart and is in greyscale to show that they are ready to give up the fight and leave the world behind, unlike their doctor who wants to prolong their life. Acceptance is defined as the last of five stages of death according to Kubler-Ross (1970) (6) ; this is what the hand letting go symbolises.

Both systemic and pulmonary parts of the heart are integral for survival. Together they provide oxygen for the body to function and neither can work without the other. This demonstrates the idea of a person having different holons/systems which cannot function alone and must rely on each other. The physiological problems are recognised by the doctor, but the psychological and social factors have been ignored.

The drawing certainly does not represent all doctor-patient relationships where death is involved, as each patient is unique with individual circumstances. I just want to highlight how sometimes, doctors can miss what is important to the patient, with whom they have contrasting priorities.

In terms of coping with death, I think that newly qualified doctors should be better prepared and receive more training so that they are comfortable with using the word dying for example and more familiar with the grief process, to better support families of the deceased. As a junior doctor, I am not sure how I will react to death but in order to better prepare myself I intend to discuss any fears with other members of the healthcare team and gain as much understanding as possible in the process of grieving. However each circumstance is unique and people cannot be labelled as being in a particular stage of grief. Training can never fully prepare you for when you encounter the situation in real life.

Having chosen to engage in creative activity I now have even more respect for the role of art in medicine. Ideas which were difficult to express in words were easy to represent in a piece of art and enabled me to reflect further on my initial ideas. From the process of producing my artwork, I have had the chance to think much more deeply about the doctor and patient perspectives of death and realise that there is also a middle ground, where there are common wants and needs after all, the doctor wants what is best for the patient.

I normally lean towards structure, and therefore a normative style, wanting to see patterns in interactions. However now I know how important it is to be a good listener; something I sometimes struggle with because I assume I already know what is going to be said based on past experience. I strive to become an active listener and in future practice, always consider the physical, psychological and social needs of patients.

References:

(1) – F Reynolds. How doctors cope with death. Arch Dis Child 2006; 91:727

(2) – E M Redinbaugh. Doctors’ emotional reactions to recent death of a patient: cross sectional study of hospital doctors. BMJ 2003;327:185

(3) – John Launer. Uniqueness and conformity. Q J Med 2003; 96:615-616

(4) – Dr Trevor Thompson. The Big Ideas in Whole Person Care. Lecture 2: Whole Person Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bristol, 2011.

(5) – Graham Scambler (ed.) Sociology as applied to Medicine. Sixth edition. London. Saunders. 2008

(6) – George Norwood. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. [online]. Available from http://www.connect.net/georgen/maslow.htm [accessed 11/03/12]

Whole Person Care, Year One, 2012